The subsumption from new theories of knowledge of the second modernity, refer to knowledge that confronts the theories of reflection characteristic of modernity first ( linear knowledge ). This is assumed from the theories of reflexivity and reflectivity theories that represent the knowledge of the second modernity ( non-linear knowledge ). Knowledge is no longer dependent on the transcendental, the established rules for producing new definitions in terms of higher complexity and attention to the contingency, from the desparadojización of the scientific knowledge of modernity first, with a view to overwhelm the domain of epistemology in the objective observer ( 41 positivism; by the observer of double hermeneutics that characterizes the method of observation of second-order and third order that characterizes the self-referentiality ( critical knowledge in second modernity or Informationskritik ). Self-referentiality sets from the observation of observations of second order and third order autodescripciones to establish the co-evolution of comments. This clears the way to produce autopoiésis, i.e., knowledge based on the identification of the processes that leverage new processes and therefore sustained creation. Thus, the subsumption assumes knowledge objects as do indóciles objects do ( to better understanding of the larger object persistence in order to get out of control )?? to produce knowledge unprecedented, born to the critique of knowledge of information capitalism ( Informationskritik ) with the functionality of intervening causes unwanted laying informationalize second modernity, in which radicalized the autonomy of the cognoscente subject and which denies the existence of postmodernism, as modernity is unfinished. Herein lies the difference between the first and second modernity, and therefore the differentiation of the critical knowledge in the West, the distinction between Ideologiekritik and Informationskritik.